|
|
|
|
January 16-18, 2004 Commentary
(weekend edition)- I'm really starting to sound like a
broken record. Another day, another new contract high for the ES, NQ and a new
high for the move on the INDU. This is just amazing in my opinion, to say the
least. This is why I said that I'm assuming 'up' until proven
otherwise. I'm going to do some follow-up again today. Let's start
with the VTSS trade. In my last column I wrote: "That little pullback/consolidation
VTSS was doing was just a springboard for today's upward thrust. My normal
temptation would be to scale out of another piece on today's big thrust. The
volume was huge at almost 18 million shares, compared to a recent average under
5 million shares per day. Normally I'd be thinking that this was a buying climax,
but I'm not so sure. This might be the start of something big. I'm willing to
risk giving back a little bit more in exchange for holding a bigger piece while
I see if this is the start of something. I had to make a judgment call here,
and you can see how I'm playing this." My intuition on this proved correct. VTSS
gapped up and just exploded, closing just three cents off the high for the day,
up another $.95. The volume expanded to over 22 million shares. This move is
just monster. It's a tough call for me in here to decide how to play this from
here. On one hand, the play is up just about 43% from my $5.89 entry trigger.
That would be a great play right there. But I want to ride the trend as much as
I can. If I keep scaling out I'll be capturing nice profits along the way, but
I may wind up 'out of ammo' if this thing keeps going. I usually
made judgment calls along the way, based on the price action and general market
and sector conditions. In this case I decided to scale out of 1/2 of a normal
scale out amount. I wanted to scale out on Thursday's thrust, but as detailed
in the commentary from that day, I held back. I have that same feeling right in
here as I had on Thursday. On the other hand, this run up is so steep. Given all
that, I opted to remove a smaller than normal amount of the position right near
the close on Friday. Now I wait and see what happens from here. I'll assess the
behavior of VTSS, and try to make the best decisions along the way. Let's
finish with VTSS with a look at the chart.
All that overhead supply gone in a flash.
This chart is just amazing. Recall when I first spotted this potential trade,
and how much before the completion-point it was. When I saw the double pattern
come together with two clear groupings, I was watching this every day. This is
the payoff for all that patience. Let's take a look now at FDX. I'll show the
daily chart again, with the pattern highlighted and the area of the grouping
marked with the two horizontal lines.
FDX finally broke out above the congestion,
as I suspected, and closed just two cents off the high for the day. Although
not as explosive as VTSS, this is a solid move off the pattern/grouping, and I
am very happy with how it is progressing. I am still letting this one develop,
and haven't done any scaling out yet. Lastly, I'd like to review a trade I posted
back in November. I laid out a grouping that I really liked on the daily chart
in the ES. The original grouping was on the December '03 contract. Let's look
at the chart of that contract showing the grouping and two regression related
lines that I had put on the chart way back when.
Those that follow my column closely may remember that
this one wiggled me out (probably because I set my stop too close for a longer
term play), and I had to pick it up again on a second entry. I don't like to
hold ES futures overnight too often, and I prefer options of some sort for
longer-term plays. Options can save me from a catastrophic overnight
move. Let's look at the current March '04 contract and how this has
played out since the move off the grouping. I'll highlight the area of the
grouping with an arrow.
Most of the
methods that I use from Kane Trading
on: Trailing Stops would still have me in this trade. There was a small
scale out for me on the first pullback, and another on that gap and slide day.
The next scale out was on the recent small pullback. That last scale out was
not triggered by a trailing stop, but by the decision to take some off the
table on the next pullback, after such a run. The remaining 2/5 of the original
position is trailing along. Looking back now, am I sorry that I scaled out the two
times in the early part of the run? No, because I had no idea that the run
would be this huge. If that area where I scaled out was it, I'd have been
elated that I caught some before it rolled over. If I waited, I may have given
everything back. My trading style tries to catch the moves that just go a small
amount, while also leaving a reasonable amount of the trade open for the big
runs. I like to have somewhere in the area of 40% to 60% (rarely) of the trade
open when the trade reaches 'big move' status. That's just my style. I can't
say if that would work for anyone else, all I can say is that that's how I like
to trade most of the time. Another thing I'd like to point out is that when I have
a setup like this I may be playing it in two, or perhaps three different ways
at the same time. I was going to say three different timeframes, but that
wouldn't be descriptively accurate. I should say 'in three different contexts'.
Let me explain. First, I might be hitting the grouping, after an entry signal, with
the ES mini for intraday swing trades. Recall that I mentioned how I took the
first bounce off the grouping, and then it rolled back down. I like to trade
the mini intraday off areas I consider significant. It gives me a 'bias' for my
intraday plays. These plays are quick, in and out plays that last some fraction
of the trading day, but get closed out before the close. Next, I may
play for the first thrust off the grouping, taking that trade off when I feel
the first thrust is done. This might take a week or so. I like to use the SPY
or the QQQ for trades like this, although I don't use those vehicles
exclusively. Finally, if I'm playing for the long haul, I really prefer options.
Although a straight call or put may be my choice, I prefer some type of option
combination strategy. This would allow me to reduce the time decay factor
(what's the trade off?) one experiences with long options. And in all this,
many times I use a proxy, in that I may choose an individual issue or even a
sector ETF or the like, to make the play. Once you start to use combination
plays, the choices are nearly infinite. I am pointing this out here to not only make
it clear the various choices that a trader may have (and of course, not all of
these choices are suited to every trader), but also to point out that plays I
highlight are not necessarily viewed by me as single plays. I may highlight an
ES play where my play was to play the mini futures for a thrust on the
3-minute. But I may also have been playing an OEX option for a week-long swing
move at the same time. I don't want the reader to get confused when I refer to
different plays or types of plays, in different contexts, that may key off the
same potential trade area. That's why I discuss so rigorously in Kane Trading on: Trailing Stops the
concept of knowing the move that you are playing for. Each different move has
me playing in a different way. I hope this gives you some ideas to play around
with. With Monday being a federal holiday, the next commentary will be
the Tuesday edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Reading this page or any page on the Kane
Trading website, or utilizing this website and any material
contained herein in any way, shall constitute an acknowledgement
that you have read, understood and agreed to all the
disclaimers,
terms & conditions, and
policies of this site.
|
|
This website is best viewed with
MSIE 6.0, text size set to medium, and screen resolution set to 1024 by 768.
Copyright © 2003 Kane
Trading. All rights reserved.
|
|